CONSTRUCTION LAW
Sexual Harassment
Pitfalls for the Unwary in the Construction Industry
By: Carol Keough
You are the general contractor on a billion-dollar construction
pipeline project. The project is nearly completed and you
are about to release all personnel, including the temporary
office personnel. The temporary secretary\clerk in the onsite
office comes to you and tells you that one of your managers
has been sexually harassing her and forced her to have a sexual
relationship with him in order to keep her job. She tearfully
tells you that when she refused to continue the relationship
with the manager he threatened to fire her. The alleged harasser,
is the person who has prepared the list of the personnel who
are to be released and her name is on that list. This scenario
may sound far fetched, but it is not. Hundreds of cases of
sexual harassment are reported to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) which investigates harassment and discrimination
claims for the Federal Government. In the year 2002, there
were 84,442 charge filings with the EEOC, 25,536 of those
claims were alleged sex\gender discrimination. What's Happening
at the EEOC, by Suzanne M. Anderson, Supervisory Trial Attorney,
U.S., EEOC Dallas District Office, published July 10, 2003.
Sexual harassment is defined by the EEOC as follows:
Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for favor and other verbal
or physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual
harassment when:
1. Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly
or implicitly a term or condition or employment;
2. Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual
is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such
individual; or
3. Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably
interfering with an individual's work performance or creating
an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment.
In 1998, the Supreme Court held the that an employer will
be automatically liable and without a defense, if a supervisor
harasses an employee and that harassment results in a "tangible
employment action." If the supervisor's harassment of
an employee does not result in a "tangible employment
action" or the harassment of an employee takes place
by a subordinate, the employer may be allowed to assert a
defense if the employer uses reasonable care to prevent harassment
and takes immediate corrective action when the harassment
occurs.
Employers have a wide range of responsibility to ensure that
the workplace is free from harassment. Employers can also
be liable for sexual harassment if the harassment of an employee
is the result of harassment on the part of a customer, vendor,
or subcontractor. The law protects employees from harassment
based on religion, sexual orientation, national origin, disability,
age and race.
Since an employer has no defense against liability for harassment
by a supervisor which results in a "tangible employment
action," it is important to understand what those terms
mean. An example of some of these actions include: undesirable
work assignments, demotion, failure to promote, hiring, firing,
changes in compensation and benefits. Consider the following
example:
Marjorie works for a building contractor developing bids
for the contractor to obtain new contracts from owners and
other contractors. Tom, Marjorie's supervisor, has asked Marjorie
to go out with him after work for drinks, dinner and other
social functions unrelated to work. Marjorie has refused to
go on any of these "dates." When Marjorie comes
up for review or a raise, Tom reports to upper management
that Marjorie has been inefficient in her job in obtaining
bids for the company and should be demoted to be the assistant
to another employee who provides bids. This demotion would
take away Marjorie's ability to earn additional commissions.
Marjorie's demotion and loss of commissions, which has caused
her both economic and professional harm, would be considered
a "tangible employment action."
Therefore, when Marjorie makes her claim of sexual harassment
against the Company, her employer would be liable for sexual
harassment by Marjorie's supervisor, Tom, without a defense.
Even without a tangible employment action, the employer can
have liability for harassment by a supervisor, another employee,
vendor, subcontractor, or customer.
The employer who knows or should know about the harassment
but fails to use reasonable care in protecting an employee
against the harassment, can be liable for a harassment claim.
An example of this situation would be as follows:
Shawna works as the clerical receptionist at the onsite office
for XYZ Construction Company. One of the men working for the
electrical subcontractor on the job has been coming into the
onsite office everyday using sexually explicit language and
telling obscene jokes. Shawna has asked the subcontractor
to stop, but the subcontractor continues this behavior whenever
he enters the onsite office. Shawna has reported the conduct
to her immediate supervisor. However, the supervisor not wanting
to offend the subcontractor, takes no action to eliminate
the subcontractor's harassing behavior.
In this instance, the employer has made two mistakes. The
employer does not have in place a complaint procedure in which
the employee can seek relief from the harassment of the subcontractor.
In addition, when a supervisor was informed of the improper
conduct on the part of the subcontractor, the supervisor does
nothing, even though the employer is now on notice regarding
the sexual harassment. Under these circumstances even though
there is no tangible employment action, the employee can file
a claim and recover for sexual harassment.
The motto of the Boy Scouts of America "Be Prepared"
should be the philosophy of every employer who seeks to prevent
liability for the company when sexual harassment occurs at
the workplace. With careful supervisor selection, effective
training, a solid written policy, appropriate investigation
procedures and a plan for corrective action, an employer can
be well armed to defend a sexual harassment claim in the ever
changing work environment for owners, contractors, subcontractors
and other construction industry employers.
Editor's Note: Carol Keough is a shareholder at Coats/Rose
in Houston.
|