CONSTRUCTION
LAW
Learning to Live With Mediation
By William M. Coats
During the past 10 years, it has become the rule rather than
the exception to mediate construction lawsuits.
Many standard form documents, including the AIA's, require
mediation as do the majority of judges where construction
cases are filed.
Those who have had unsuccessful mediation experiences often
see the process as an expensive prerequisite to final consideration
of the case by a court. But skepticism about the mediation
process only serves to deprive you of the opportunity to reach
an early conclusion of a lawsuit without the expense and hassle
of a trial.
The fact is that mediation works in the vast majority of construction
cases, and it is here to stay in Texas. Just as you should
participate in every other stage of the litigation process
in order to protect your rights, you should fully participate
in the mediation process.
There are several basic points that can be made about mediation
of construction cases.
Insist on a mediator with some knowledge
of the construction process If there is a single common
factor in the mediations that I have handled that have not
been successful, it is that the mediator had little knowledge
of the construction process and construction law.
Some mediators have experience with medical malpractice cases
or other tort cases but do not have the background to separate
the wheat from the chaff when it comes to construction issues
brought up during mediation. A strong construction law professional
acting as a mediator has the ability to spot and discuss weaknesses
in both parties' cases that can lead to the moderation required
to reach a settlement.
If your counsel does not know a good construction mediator,
the State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section maintains
a list that can be used as a starting point.
Be prepared Most construction
cases are factually complicated, and it is important to come
to the mediation with an organized summary of your position
in the case to present at the opening session. A good way
to present this type of summary is with a PowerPoint presentation
using excerpts from the key documentary support for your case.
It is often a good idea to furnish the mediator and other
parties with a written summary of your position so that your
arguments are readily available to the other side throughout
the entire mediation.
There is a misperceived downside that by fully educating the
other party about your case during mediation, you may be giving
up the element of surprise at trial. The fact is that there
is little surprise at trial on the main issues of construction
cases due to the extent of document discovery that occurs
in modern legal practice and the extent to which facts of
construction disputes are dependent on the contemporaneous
documentary record of the project.
Listen You can learn a lot about the potential weakness (or
strengths) of your case from the other party and from the
views expressed by the mediator. This information can be invaluable
in deciding whether or not to settle the case at various levels,
and in the preparation for trial if the case does not settle.
Think before you speak The mediator is interested in putting
a settlement notch on his stock; he is not interested in maximizing
the result for either party. When you disclose a "bottom
line" to the mediator, you can be assured that he will
not work hard in the other room to reach a number above (or
below) that. The moves in position that are disclosed to the
mediator should be thought out by your team before the mediator
is advised of them.
Be patient The moderating necessary on both sides to reach
a settlement takes time, sometimes several days. Let the mediator
continue to work as long as he thinks the process is not wasting
time.
Consider mediating more than once I am a proponent of early
mediation, before large legal expenses have been incurred
by either party. If that doesn't work, consider mediating
again when the facts are further developed.
Trials are expensive, construction cases doubly so. Fully
mediated cases settle out of court more often than not, but
that outcome requires full participate in the mediation process.
|